Stirring up the abyss
Nov. 16th, 2009 08:54 pmMany years ago I read an article about attempts to explain the vertical stirring of the oceans as determined by various experimental studies. The efficacy of swimming animals was discussed. Whales & sharks, of course, make quite a stir, but there aren't enough of them to accomplish much. It turned out that shrimps had the greatest effect; their huge numbers made up for their modest size. Even they, however, were a couple of orders of magnitude short of the observed stirring. I eventually worked this puzzle into a sentimental poem: Epithalamium.
Today I happened on a snippet in the Caltech house organEngineering & Science (Fall 2009, p. 8) revealing the present state of this question. It seems oceanographers have discovered boundary-layer theory. A solid body moving with with respect to a fluid drags a layer of fluid with it, and the slower the motion, the thicker the layer. (This was weighed in on me some time ago by my noticing that a light breeze was often suddenly evident on removing a screen from a window, and by copyediting a journal article in which a rocket engineer miserably confessed that he had not realized that the flow around a supported model in a wind tunnel does not approach the free-body flow as the thickness of the supports approaches zero. One time, I happened to sit next to a beautiful bear on a train, who had been driven out of meteorology by the math required, and told him about all this.) Thus, the tiniest (& thus most numerous & slowest) particles, including swimming plankton and sinking detritus, turn out to be the chief mixers.
COMMENTS:
come_to_think 151.203.92.235
2011-10-12 09:48 pm (local)
I have looked up some of the references, and it's *much* more complicated than I described above. A body carries some fluid with it even in the completely inviscid limit; viscosity increases the effect. I had naively supposed that the viscous boundary layer had a thickness given by the kinematic viscosity divided by the velocity; that is completely wrong. At present I do not understand the situation at all.
come_to_think 96.233.17.236
2014-10-01 10:00 am (local)
Back to shrimp! http://www.wallstreetotc.com/mighty-sea-monkeys-in-multitudes-can-power-ocean-currents-just-like-tides/29970/
Today I happened on a snippet in the Caltech house organ
COMMENTS:
come_to_think 151.203.92.235
2011-10-12 09:48 pm (local)
I have looked up some of the references, and it's *much* more complicated than I described above. A body carries some fluid with it even in the completely inviscid limit; viscosity increases the effect. I had naively supposed that the viscous boundary layer had a thickness given by the kinematic viscosity divided by the velocity; that is completely wrong. At present I do not understand the situation at all.
come_to_think 96.233.17.236
2014-10-01 10:00 am (local)
Back to shrimp! http://www.wallstreetotc.com/mighty-sea-monkeys-in-multitudes-can-power-ocean-currents-just-like-tides/29970/